One of my favorite
Kudzu cartoons would have worked well within the column, but
it didn't occur to me as I was creating.
Frame one: Dear Preacher, How do you define "God"?
Theologian.
Frame two: Dear Theologian, The Holy is greater than the sum of Its parts.
Believing is Seeing
By Bill Lewellis
May, 2001, The Express-Times, Easton
Seeing is believing. Or is it?
A 1999 movie I have not seen was called At
First Sight. I understand it's a love story. Virgil has been
blind since he was one year old. Amy encourages him into treatment
on restoring sight. After a successful operation, Virgil finds
that seeing doesn't mean understanding what one sees. He has
no reference to interpret what he sees. They work through this
together.
Publicity for the movie includes a creative tagline: "Only
love can bring you to your senses. Science gave him sight. She
gave him vision."
Seeing has as much to do with relationship as
with sight. With "we," if you will, as with "I."
Modern men and women, unlike the post-moderns
we may become, have grown far too comfortable with taking things
apart. For our minds to get hold of something, we think we have
to take it apart. That often sends us on a strange and destructive
journey.
When we look too intently at parts, it might seem
that they make sense apart from one another.
Take the Christian notion of faith, hope and love.
Is it possible really for one of these to exist with authenticity
apart from the other two. Think about it. Should we presume that
religious faith is an act of mind and will that can happen all
by itself? Is it possible to have genuine religious faith without
hope and trust in God and love for God and one another?
Think about genuine religious faith, not caricatures
of "true believers" practicing "drive by believing," i.e., belittling,
patronizing or destroying the less than orthodox among us.
Some 12 years ago an Episcopal priest wrote a
book for skeptics and for churches interested in ministry among
skeptics: So You Think You're Not Religious. He suggested that
the Latin word translated into English as "I believe" -- Credo
-- really means "I set my heart."
We have no verb form in English for heart. Our
English translation suggests we are dealing only with matters of
the mind.
Don't rely on the argument from word derivation.
As intriguing as it may sound, it might not be tightly woven.
Rely on your own sense of authenticity. Think
about this the next time you pray "I believe in one God... in one
Lord, Jesus Christ... who was made man... was crucified, suffered
death... and rose again... in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver
of life... in one holy catholic and apostolic Church, one baptism
for the forgiveness of sins... the resurrection of the dead, and
the life of the world to come...
Might your prayerful recitation of that creed
be more than intellectual assent? Doesn't it seem more like I believe,
I hope, I trust, I love, I set my heart on God who loves me and
who has done these wonderful things for me?
There is no genuine faith apart from hope and
love. When we truly believe, we also hope and love. When we do
all of this, we begin to see things differently. We begin to see
things as they are, not as they appear.
"Have you believed because you have seen me?" Jesus
says near the end of the Gospel according to John. "Blessed are
those who have not seen and yet have come to believe."
[The Rev. Canon Bill
Lewellis is communication
minister for the Diocese of Bethlehem, the Episcopal Church in
a 14-county area of northeastern Pennsylvania.]
Return to Column Index