Bishop Paul' Confirmation Sermon
St. Stephen's, Whitehall
March 30, 2003
Back in my college days my girlfriend did something to me that hurt me to the
core of my being, and humiliated me to boot. Then she did something far, far
worse: she was truly sorry, said so, and apologized. There are times when to
respond "no problem" to an apology is an obscenity, denying both
the depth of the hurt and the sincerity of apology. This was one of them.
My love for her, together with my Christian belief and my desire for peace
all prompted me to forgive her, and I did. Then the frustration started. I
soon realized that by forgiving her I gave up the right to look hurt, appear
the victim, to sulk, to make her suffer by seeing my pain. I had not planned
on losing that when I forgave her for something that wounded me so profoundly.
In my generous act, I had accidentally given up my repertoire of subtle revenge.
So this is what it is like to be an adult, I thought.
After realizing that I had no weapons left, or at least none that I could use
without feeling silly, I also realized that something had changed inside me.
Although there remained a few neural pathways of habit jerking with the desire
to exact little punishments here and there, to rub her nose in this or that,
I now realized that in having forgiven out of love for her, I had lost my fury.
It just wouldn't feel real to act wounded or to withdraw. Old habits die hard,
and so I tried to sulk a few times, but could not. The encounter was life-giving
and slightly frustrating. The best I could manage is to look sort of, well,
convalescing, which is not very satisfying--and slightly comic.
Something died in me that day, and its death was a release. Habitual recourse
to outrage or victimhood simply perpetuates suffering. On the other hand, having
the upper hand morally and using it to reconcile rather than to punish gives
life to all around. It was turning out to be a good Lent after all.
I have written several times that our souls are in the most danger -- and we
are potentially the most dangerous to others -- when we believe that we are
in the right: no other statement in my little newspaper column has gotten quite
the same degree of angry correspondence. Many heard that idea as suggesting
that there is something wrong with being right, or that there is no such thing
as absolute truth or that there is no right and wrong. None of that was my
point: it's just that Crusaders kill.
"While we were yet sinners, God loved us," wrote St. Paul long ago.
To forgive comes not from being satisfied that an offense is paid for, but from
the desire to overcome separation and hostility. Jesus was at his most infuriating
when his first word from the cross was, "Father forgive them," even
offering an excuse for his enemies, that they did not know what they were doing.
To forgive someone while they are still hurting you is to inhabit a level of
compassion that most of us seldom visit, except perhaps with our children.
The wound my girlfriend gave me has hurt for a long time, perhaps it will for
ever, just as my arm would remain chopped off if that is what she had done
to me. Forgiveness does not fix, but it can heal or perhaps overcome. As I
am still learning, it does not come cheap.
It's getting close to Good Friday. When we see human nature -- our nature --
at work in that act, we can recognize God's love overcoming sin as Christ continues
to love us at our very worst. St. John's telling of this story has the crucified
Christ "drawing" people to him. It is not the sense of a bill being
paid, but the portrayal of God's love being faithful to my unloving self, that
continually draws me to Jesus and the way of life he offers.
Jesus said that when he was lifted on the cross it would save just like the
serpent Moses made saved people in the wilderness. When they looked at that
snake they saw two things: their sin and God's desire to overcome it. In just
the same way, said Jesus, when we see him on the cross, we see both the depth
of human sin and the utter faithfulness of God's love.
In the long run, you cannot have it both ways. You cannot be a follower of
Jesus and look for revenge, even the subtle kinds we wreak on our loved ones
by looking very, very hurt. Many people punish others by crying; did you know
that?
If you are signing up to be a follower of Jesus, you stand up bravely for him
and for truth, but you remember that he would not let Peter chop up the enemy.
That's a sad story about Peter, isn't it? One minute Peter pulls out his sword
and tries to carve up the high priest's servant to save Jesus; the next minute
he is busy denying that he even knows Jesus. It doesn't pay to be too cocky
spiritually, any more than any other way.
One of the most challenging passages in the New Testament is the
simple command to "be angry and sin not." One of the things
I value about this diocese is that with very few exceptions, when
people disagree passionately, they usually do so without acting like
the other guy is evil or contemptible. Many of you being confirmed
today are still wonderfully young. Use your youth to work as hard
as you can to know what you believe, and to be able to defend it
without attacking the worth of other human people. People who have
to get nasty usually do so to mask the shallowness of their learning
or their faith, or both. I know few deeply pious or learned people
who have to call names, and yet they can make themselves perfectly
well understood.
When you do a number on somebody, whether you are right or wrong, you work
against yourself, you defeat your purpose. Think about it. Did you ever want
to change your mind because somebody insulted you? Of course not. When the
insults start flying, people dig the trenches. Why cannot human being figure
this out?
If you vow today at Confirmation to be so thoroughly on Christ's side that
you can be like a soldier under his complete command, obeying his orders without
question, you must bring the mystery of the cross deeper and deeper inside
you. It's what we all do every day, and certainly at every liturgy.
I've had some enjoyment in writing a book about the man who gave us the consecration
prayer we have in the 1928 prayer book and in Rite One of the 1979 prayer book.
He knew exactly what he was doing. That prayer is about the cross of Christ
-- and every priest hopes not to trip over the words "innumerable benefits
procured unto us by the same" -- but those words about innumerable benefits
are about the cross of Christ that brings us forgiveness and life. That would
be fine, if that was all that the consecration prayer said. But the consecration
prayer insists that you cannot leave it there. We are to live the cross we
adore, and so we say "and here we offer and present unto thee, O Lord,
our selves, our souls, and bodies, to be a reasonable, holy, and living sacrifice
unto thee." You can't come to Jesus for peace without offering to be Jesus'
person to bring peace to others. The prayer book is taking a lot of its language
there from the twelfth chapter of Romans, where Saint Paul asks precisely the
same thing of us.
From the Cross Jesus asked forgiveness for those who were not sorry. On Easter
his first words to those scaredy-cat disciples who had deserted him was "peace
be to you." If you want to know yourself, listen up: it is how we treat
those who do not deserve kindness that will teach us what kind of people we
really are.
Archbishop Cranmer was very simple about this: if you are holding a grudge
against another Christian, don't come to communion or it will be your damnation.
Just stay away until you get over it. Holy Communion is not about being the
winner, it is about being totally dependent on the forgiving love of Christ.
To try to have it any other way is not to have it at all. But to have it Christ's
way is to have absolutely everything and heaven, too.
Return to Sermon Index
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org