Pentecost Sermon
To Convert, To Proclaim, To Witness - What is the Difference?
Bishop Paul V. Marshall
Cathedral Church of the Nativity, June 11, 2000
[God's presence and power are available to those who lay down enough
of their intensity or timidity to become receptive... Put the word "witness" where
you usually use the word "convert," and see what is different inside
you and in the communication...]
It is so good to greet you on Pentecost, the seal on the great fifty
days of our Easter celebration. However, I must also acknowledge
that this is a very busy weekend for Nativity. You have set a very
high standard in terms of hospitality and the art of the quick change.
I am profoundly grateful for the grace and flexibility with which
Nativity hosted the Diocesan Convention, and look forward very much
to the concert this afternoon.
In the center of all that is happening, however, we have the feast
of Pentecost, and celebrate the feast this morning with brothers
and sisters who are taking new steps in their life in Christ.
Pentecost is the day when we remember that the risen Christ continues
to live in the Church through the power of God's Holy Spirit. Whenever
we get too precise about what those words mean, we immediately tie
ourselves in knots; and, frustrating as that is, I think there is
purpose here. God's presence and power are available to those who
lay down enough of their intensity or timidity to become receptive.
In the story from Acts that we just read, it was to the devout, the
ones open to God, that the miracle happened. They heard in their
own languages. For most of us who work with words, and I certainly
include myself, this is a particularly important reminder. The Spirit
comes to those who lay themselves open to it.
I am intrigued as I consider those few words in our lesson, that
everyone "heard in their own language" the marvelous deeds of God
in Jesus Christ. What does it mean to us to speak words that people
can hear when they need to hear them? It's the oldest and most worn-out
story most of us know, the one about the spouse who says, "You never
tell me that you love me anymore," only to be answered, "I told you
that I loved you when we got married in 1965, and if I change my
mind, I'll let you know." It's old, but it makes the point: communication
means expressing a message in a way people can receive and at a time
when they can receive it.
One of the interesting things I have learned in the transition from
academic word warrior to pastor of a diocese is the necessity of
saying what one sees as the truth in words that other people can
hear. I am beginning to learn that when I feel the urge to lecture
coming on the best thing to do is take three Tylenol, a caffeine-free
diet Pepsi, and lie down until the urge to let them have it passes.
Nonetheless, I stand amazed at the number of people in the world,
and sadly we always have a few in religious circles, who think that
the best way to convince others of what they are saying is to insult
them.
I think that we can admit that we have done the same at one time
or another, from giving a mild rebuff on one hand, to offering those
stinging rebukes that only those who love each other dearly for many
years have the ammunition and carelessness to spew and regret. The
unacknowledged need to punish, to vanquish, or to control, can ruin
the communication of very important messages.
When Jesus speaks of the power of the Holy Spirit, he uses concepts
like comforter, companion, advocate. He speaks of Spirit-given power
as enlightening and even as the power to forgive sins. It is not
clear that we have always gotten the message.
I think where we get into trouble both in the ordinary secular sense
and in the sense of advancing religious truth is that the sense of "converting" someone
is often an act of domination. "To convert" people, as a description
of what Christians are to do, is not an expression you will find
anywhere in the Bible. I think I know why. The satisfaction that
comes from getting people to submit to our way of thinking, especially
after a long tussle, is very high on the list of human pleasures.
I have heard speeches, religious and secular, that were really acts
of bullying thinly disguised as the communication of values. I have
never quite recovered from hearing the parents who lost a child to
crib death being told for 45 minutes that if they wanted to see that
child again, they should clean up their act and get right with God.
Some bullying is not as direct, though. Did you ever find yourself
discussing in a general way before a group of people something that
you would have taken up with an individual if only you had more courage?
This is a particular sin of preachers and teachers, but it happens
in family groups and business meetings, too. There is no feeling
quite like a public "gottcha," especially when the victim does not
have the power to respond.
If going out with hammer and tongue, as it were, to change other
people's minds is not the model of communicating in God's Spirit,
what is?
The two biblical words that I like are "proclaim" and "witness." One
is entirely objective, "to proclaim." We can set out Good News in
a way that does not have a personal spin on it, just tell it like
it is, and let what happens happen. This is what Jesus is trying
to get across when he talks about the word falling on good soil,
rocky soil, and so on. Sometimes in life it is our job to simply
say what we believe is the truth, and let God worry about the rest.
Being a parent would have been a lot easier for me if I had given
this idea a good deal of thought.
But there is another biblical idea about communication that I want
to look at, especially with those of you who are taking new steps
in your life in Christ today, and that is the word "witness." The
word witness is a translation of the word "martyr." That word brings
ups scary images: Christians being fed to wild animals, killed by
gladiators, roasted alive over slow fires, used as living torches...
and so on.
It is very important that we remember those people who witnessed
to their faith by how they died, or why they died, and some other
time we need to focus on that. The concern here is how we live. What
I am asking this morning is that we put the word "witness" where
we usually use the word "convert," and see what is different inside
us and in the communication.
When we try to convert people, the unspoken theme is "I'm right,
you're wrong," and "you should" do this or that. This is where divorce,
co-dependency and warping our children often start. Like a lot of
people at my time of life, I'm not especially proud of my parenting;
but I do think one important thing I did with my kids was apologize
to them when I saw that I was wrong. I hope they will live without
thinking that being wrong is the end of the world.
When we witness, we share what we have seen God do or what actually
works in our lives, and do it just as graciously and generously as
we set a table with our best cooking for guests to eat. Witnessing
is gentle, is focused on nurture rather than domination. Witnessing
is calm because it comes from the one thing on which any of us can
speak with authority, that which God has worked in us, what has been
given to us. Witness is presence with people, not coming at them.
In the context of witness, powerful words can be said. Any of you
familiar with the various 12-step programs know that they work because
the principle of witness is used precisely where we would normally
reach for a fire axe.
In a few minutes we will all renew our promise to witness by word
and example to the good news of God in Christ. What I've been up
to in talking this morning is to suggest that our lives and our attitudes
speak volumes, and that, knowing that our lives and attitudes speak
volumes, we try to find ways of saying what we believe most deeply
in ways that share our joy in and passion for God, and sincerely
invite others to that feast.
Return to Sermon Index
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org