Churches Need To Ask Why
They Exist
Bishop Paul V. Marshall
January 2002
Over the past few decades, a small industry has
devoted itself to diagnosing mainline religion's "crisis." A focus
on survival has ignored the original sense of crisis as a point of
judgment, a point of evaluating performance and deciding identity
and direction.
When the institution appears to be in danger of
disappearing, all but the most unthinking or insecure ask what the
institution is for, and whether it has been effective in meeting
its purpose.
One response to the crisis as the Episcopal Church
has experienced it troubles me. It is the idea that all will be well
if we simply keep on doing what we do well, by which is generally
meant emphasizing our talents for liturgy and the fostering of personal
spirituality in the Benedictine tradition.
Readers from other denominations and faiths, I suspect,
have heard the "keeping on" response in ways that apply to their
own traditions.
The suggestion that we simply keep on keeping on
epitomizes the great American failure trap: if something does not
work, do it more. More intensely. With greater fervor.
At its worst, the "do it more" syndrome assumes
that the answers and the questions never change. The baby is kept
in bath water that may kill it, in a tub that stunts its growth.
There are ways to question this approach that do
not detract from the importance of our traditions and gifts.
In opposition to the "do it more" fallacy lies the
truth of the law of requisite variety: those who have the most options
succeed. Those who face a crisis as a time to assess, learn and attempt
to change for the better are likely to make the helpful contribution.
To use the law of requisite variety means being honest: learning
from mistakes and wrong turns, learning to part with what has become
obsolete.
Christianity's mission can be described generally
as offering to people that fullness of life in God available to disciples
of Jesus Christ and witnessing to Jesus' call for everyone to enact
God's compassion and justice in the world. Our mission is to serve
the world in the name of Christ, to extend compassionate arms even
while new spears pierce Christ's body as they did on September 11.
The mission cannot be performed without intense
self-awareness. Are we prepared to choose the right strategies for
our time? If we are to perform the mission we have been given, we
have got to be better at making explicit connections between people's
lives as they are and the kind of life God offers in Christ.
Christian bodies have taken chances. That is a valuable
trait. The value of the fact that American Christians have been forced
by history to create an atmosphere where passionate disagreement
is possible ought not be underestimated.
Experience suggests that those of us who preach
will do better at helping the faithful to be faithful if we make
more explicit and inviting the connection of the church's activities
to its identity in Jesus Christ, and if we do that in words and in
ways that contemporary Christians can hear.
We live in an age when one risks being locked up
as psychotic for claiming that God communicates; yet, in one way
or another, that is what happens - at least when we learn to listen.
Deep within us the Spirit breathes. We are invited to enter those
depths. God heals us, gives us more than we can ask or imagine, and
enables us to become agents of change in an unjust, painful and starving
world. Such transformation can be frightening.
Return
to the index of Bishop Paul's columns for the secular press
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org