Shall We Fund Education or Institutionalize Poverty and Racism?
Bishop Paul V. Marshall
July 2000
A recent cartoon in The National Catholic Reporter caricatured a
jubilant Uncle Sam. Frame one: "We're on top of the world." Frame
two: "The stock market is booming. Unemployment barely exists. Budget
deficits are a thing of the past." Frame three: Money is pouring
in. We're rich?" In the concluding frame Uncle Sam says, "Someday
we might even be rich enough to educate our children."
My work takes me regularly to 14 Pennsylvania counties. One thing
that strikes me is how wonderful public education is in some areas
and how desperately neglected it is in others.
In the few years I have occupied my present position, three cities
in Pennsylvania that contain some of the worst schools have been
willing to assume burdens up to a billion dollars for sports facilities.
In one of our cities, schools are so under-funded that teachers buy
basic classroom supplies with their own funds and local churches
cooperate to raise money for textbooks. To educate our children is
primarily the state's obligation, but also local government's.
Children who most need the education ticket out of poverty are being
deprived of it.
Our way of addressing educational issues in this state institutionalizes
poverty. That so many of the children who are the victims of this
situation are Hispanic or African-American suggests that racism also
is institutionalized.
Children have a unique role in our society. Though politicians often
call children "our future," their needs are here-and-now. It is up
to our state government to do what has been done in so many parts
of America, making sure that educational resources are distributed
adequately now, not in a few years.
One frequently hears of how difficult it is to get a good labor
force in America. Does it not occur to anyone that the solution to
that problem starts in grammar school?
The teams and businesses that will profit from the events ought
to be building the sports facilities. Dishonest trickle-down theory,
suggesting that money eventually reaches those in need, sells the
public on huge sports facilities. The truth is that many bites will
have been taken out of the pie before Jane and Johnny see their share.
Obviously we can't have it all without increasing taxation, so we
have to learn to accept limits. This is perhaps the hardest thing
for Baby Boomers to accept now that it is our time to run things.
Although we have experienced what feels like wealth without limits,
resources are limited. If the topic is health, transportation, or
education, we have to learn how to manage what is there without immediately
asking for more.
The word from religious circles that has become business parlance
and desperately needs to penetrate political circles is "stewardship." It's
about distributing limited resources in a world of apparently infinite
need according to accepted major goals.
To adopt a stewardship view on a personal level is to ask how one
plans to fund his or her life's main goals. We really are familiar
with this kind of thinking. Do we spend money today for a pool in
the back yard, or do we put that money away for retirement or a child's
education?
Still, we assume that on the public level resources do not have
to be managed in terms of goals rather than votes.
We need to remain aware that there is an education crisis in Pennsylvania
and remind ourselves that not everybody can have everything they
want. Can we have both schools and arenas at the present level of
taxation? That is a question for economic experts. If we must choose
between stadium and school, however, let's choose our children and
their future.
Return
to the index of Bishop Paul's columns for the secular press
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org