Conflict advances truth
Don't Confuse Being Valuable With Being Right
By Bishop Paul V. Marshall
Column for Newspapers, October 1999
Have you ever tried to discuss an idea and, when mentioning that
you disagree with what someone has proposed, you are told that they
are a good person? This emotional blackmail is meant to end the discussion
rather than risk a conversation.
Religious groups of any stripe I know about all seem to have many
people who are afraid of conflict. They cannot distinguish in their
minds between disagreement and condemnation. Afraid to say "no," they
live with things they cannot agree with or do jobs they do not really
want to do. One day they explode. Then the situation often cannot
be repaired, and the group has a problem that may take years to overcome,
if it can be overcome.
Because people are afraid of conflict, religious institutions and
community groups often tolerate behavior that would be unacceptable
at any other level of society.
I have been aware of people storming out of meetings after committing
atrocious behavior, and the rest of the group nervously wondering
how they could get the offender back. Such groups operate with the
unspoken belief that if they stand up against bad behavior and for
their basic principles, they will not survive. The opposite, in fact,
is true. One compromise leads to another, and their major goals are
missed altogether, because there is no backbone in the organism.
There is no law against conflict in either the Hebrew or Christian
scriptures. Rather than encouraging silence, the New Testament urges
readers to "speak the truth in love." The prophets in Israel pulled
no punches. Jesus is not remembered as just going along with things
for the sake of apparent peace. In fact, the gospels have him on
one occasion more or less "disowning" his mother and brothers and
sisters when they tried to stop him from disturbing the public mind.
There is nothing wrong with saying, "I think you did the wrong thing," or "Where
I disagree with you is." (It is often helpful to ask a question first,
however!)
There is everything wrong with saying "Because you did such and
such, you are stupid, worthless, etc." My complaint about most of
the talk show hosts I hear on the radio, whether liberal or conservative,
is that they poison the American mind. Rather than just disagreeing
about facts and their interpretation, they dismiss the intelligence
or emotional stability of the other side. The poison is real and
it is spreading. How many liberals have you heard habitually characterizing
conservatives as reactionary, selfish, or racist? How many conservatives
have you heard habitually characterizing liberals as simple-minded,
emotional, or impractical?
Why does no one criticize political spending in terms of the number
of mouths it could feed? I dread every major election year because
political parties spend fortunes to keep the American public from
discussing basic issues objectively. To do so would be to admit that
each party has some truth behind its platform, and that nobody operates
without self-interest of one kind or another.
Conflict -- disagreement discussed thoroughly and fairly -- is the
primary means of advancing the truth. Careful listening and thoughtful
response advance common understanding and progress. Conflict that
is kept on the level of ideas but does not discuss personalities
is a sign of health, of thinking.
That some political and religious movements teach people not to
think is a burden that diminishes every culture. Even in an age when
it seems that "sensitivity" remains the highest virtue, it is no
sin to disagree vigorously with an idea or someone's perception of
events.
On the other hand, perhaps it is a sin to confuse being valuable
with being right. Surely, no one is always right! The first sign
of healthy humility is the ability to be taught. Conflict without
nastiness, then, may be the most caring path of all.
Return
to the index of Bishop Paul's columns for the secular press
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org