Littleton -- A Watershed for the Culture
By Bishop Paul V. Marshall
May 1999 column for newspapers
I started my professional life as a high school teacher. Anyone
who has spent time with young people in what are for most of us the
most difficult years cannot but agonize at the thought of those young
bodies lying limp on the library floor in Littleton.
Examine the Culture
What has caused additional agony is the flood of agenda-running that has followed
this tragedy. It seems that each writer knows that if only his or her theory
had been followed, this tragedy could have been prevented. Religious people
have not been absent among those with easy answers.
The more we learn about the violence in Littleton, however, the
more complex the problem appears, and it seems that we will have
to take a fearless and thorough look at our entire culture.
What stands in the way of looking at how the totality of our culture
shaped these horrible events seems to be our American addiction to
blame, denial and displacement.
Blame
There is something comforting about knowing whom to blame. It's almost magical:
anxiety disappears when we know whose fault something is. Knowing whom to
blame provides a sense of closure, and, more important, makes it clear that
somebody other than ourselves is responsible for what has gone wrong.
As I surf the Net, I see working mothers, the NRA, permissive school
officials, the entertainment industry, and even the gay community
blamed for Littleton. In each case the impression is left that one
particular group is responsible for what occurred.
The times call for us to suspend blaming (and the relief it brings),
and take inventory of the factors in our nation's life that produce
violence such as daily road rage and the extraordinary horror we
still grieve over in Colorado.
Denial
Denial has been popping up every day since the first reports from Columbine
School.
Some people seem to dismiss everything from the Valentine's Day
Massacre to Mi Lai as an aberration, and urge us to think about all
the good people.
Gun-fanciers have been quick to point out that only two-tenths of
one percent of all guns in the country are used in committing crime,
as if that settled the gun question.
Usually very wise representatives of the women's movement seem unable
to concede that the progress and justice women have achieved in recent
years may have had some fallout on the way children develop.
No one is willing to admit that their cause -- or their usual way
of doing things -- might have some tiny down-side. And so we have
a kind of impasse, with progress prevented because of our difficulty
of seeing the gray in most situations and working together to correct
it.
Displacement
Our national tendency toward displacement is equally insidious. We know people
who think they can save their marriage by having a child rather than by working
on their relationship -- and pity such a child. If we let Littleton be about
guns or parenting or school security, we lose the opportunity to identify
and work on the complex of issues that erode our national life. A sneaky
form of displacement is Rodney King syndrome, the mistaken belief that all
that is required is for each person to try to be a little nicer to everyone,
with no requirement to examine and overhaul values.
A Watershed
While there is no way to find a silver lining in the tragedy of Littleton,
and certainly no way to kid ourselves with rosy talk about people not "dying
in vain," whatever that means, we have once again as a Nation received a
wake-up call.
The question before us is whether we will tether our sacred cows
and set aside our financial and personal priorities long enough to
look at the factors that threaten to destroy us as a people. At no
time since the Civil War have we stood at such a watershed.
Return
to the index of Bishop Paul's columns for the secular press
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org