Bring on the Religious Voices ... Please
Bishop Paul V. Marshall
February 1997 column for newspapers
One sometimes feels as though a moral position gotten from a fortune
cookie will be more acceptable in public debate than one stemming
from faith.
A national newspaper editorialized about an American "moral vacuum" as
it became clear that Newt Gingrich would be reprimanded for an ethics
violation. Similar cries were briefly raised over the House banking
scandal and the Savings and Loan bailout. A former mayor of New York
can say, "I didn't commit a crime; I just didn't comply with the
law." A former president claims, "If the president does it, it's
not illegal." A hotel queen sneers, "Only little people pay taxes."
It is not hard to argue that America has no moral system to speak
of. From the permissiveness of thirty years ago, we have arrived
at a point where it is considered downright rude to suggest to anyone
that their personally chosen moral standards are discussible, much
less in need of reexamination or correction. The assumption that
desiring something implies a right to have it, goes largely unchallenged.
Long after he had anything to gain by it, George Washington made
an observation in his Farewell Address of 1796 that speaks to today's
moral dilemma:
"Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be
maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence
of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience
both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion
of religious principle."
The First Amendment, prohibiting government subsidy or special privilege
for any religious group, was well in place when Washington spoke
those words. We have trouble hearing them because in recent years
freedom of religion has been replaced by a trend to suppress religious
voices in public life. Legislation becomes suspect if a religious
group is too strongly identified with it. One sometimes feels as
though a moral position gotten from a fortune cookie will be more
acceptable in public debate than one stemming from faith. "Let's
not bring religion into it" rules out most of the moral and ethical
thinking that has taken place in human history.
How our children are *not* taught about Martin Luther King, Jr.,
offers a clear illustration of a near-phobia about religion in our
schools. Presentations of his life and work often speak of him as
a civil rights leader, and that's all. Not mentioned is the fact
that his speeches and writings show his ideas to spring from the
content of his religious faith, and that the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference in which he worked was a religious organization.
King's particular style and emphases cannot be understood without
understanding his religion. The same is true for Malcolm X, whose
religious journey had tremendous effect on his teaching.
This is not to suggest that religion in any of its forms has all
the answers -- something to try when we tire of thinking for ourselves.
Quite the contrary, faith communities are meant to be safe and powerful
places to test our thinking with people who share our starting point.
It also has to be admitted, of course, that like other movements
religion has helped to support, excuse, or ignore great evils. It
has also been the inspiration of those who changed the world for
the better, however, whether one looks to Martin Luther King or Mother
Theresa. And it is impossible to consider the Jewish scriptures,
e.g., the books of Genesis and Exodus, about the circumstances leading
to the creation of Israel and not wonder at the power of religious
identity.
"Religion" means "that which binds." Religious thinking begins with
the idea that people are bound to one another and to God, that life
has connectedness, meaning, and purpose. People who believe they
are bound to one another and to God have a different starting point
when they consider morality. For them, a new factor is present in
the equation from the beginning: responsibility to others.
Return
to the index of Bishop Paul's columns for the secular press
Please direct any
questions or comments to the webmaster@diobeth.org